The Pro-Abortion Rhetoric Primer Poster

The Pro-Abortion Rhetoric Primer Poster

click on image to enlarge

US President Barack Obama’s address to Planned Parenthood on the subject of “women’s health” was a masterpieceof deceptive rhetoric. Not once in during the entire speech did he mention abortion.

Why?

This question is especially important since Planned Parenthood performed a record number of abortions (333,964) and profits ($87.4 million in excess revenue and $1.265 billion in net assets [!]) in the 2011-2012 fiscal year (2011-2012 Annual Report here).

It’s simple to understand. This is merely a rhetorical game to blind the public to the reality of what on-demand abortion actually is. Even pro-abortion advocates from the ’70s admit this:

“The process of eroding the old ethic and substituting the new has already begun. It may be seen most clearly in changing attitudes toward human abortion. In defiance of the long held Western ethic of intrinsic and equal value for every human life regardless of its stage, condition, or status, abortion is becoming acceptable by society as moral, right, and even necessary… since the old ethic has not been fully displaced it has been necessary to separate the idea of abortion from the idea of killing, which continues to be socially abhorrent. The result has been a curious avoidance of the scientific fact, which everyone really knows, that human life begins at conception and is continuous whether intra- or extra-uterine until death. The very considerable semantic gymnastics which are required to rationalize abortion as anything but taking a human life would be ludicrous if they were not often put forth under socially impeccable auspices. It is suggested that this schizophrenic sort of subterfuge is necessary because while a new ethic is being accepted the old one has not yet been rejected.”

– California Medicine
113, no.3 (1970), reprinted in The Human Life Review 1, no.1 (1975): 103-4.

How odd that an organization would perform hundreds of thousands of abortions a year when its founder would have called it “a disgrace to civilization”

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “The Pro-Abortion Rhetoric Primer Poster

  1. How do animal rights activists defend the “rights” of animals to not be used as sustenance for human beings, yet children in utero have no rights to not be killed for the sake of convenience, economics, and for no particular reason at all.

    Like

    • I can only hope an animal rights activist might read this and respond.

      But it is interesting how that unborn children are denied the basic human right to life. This is done by claiming (“claim” meaning “making a statement with no evidence”) that the unborn are not humans, therefore they don’t have human rights. As the quote under the cartoon highlights, that life begins at conception is a scientific fact.

      These days, people treat animals far better than fellow humans. In fact, there was a couple that drowned their newborn baby and got 2 years in prison. (They were released early for good behavior!) There are no few news stories of people getting 4+ years for killing dogs and cats.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s